This is the fourth installment in a series on The 5 Big Ideas of Enterprise 2.0 -- my look back at my 5 key takeaways from 2008's Enterprise 2.0 conference as I get ready to attend the 2009 conference June 22-25 in Boston. (Click here to receive a 30% discount off registration or a free pavillion pass to this year's conference)
Number 4: Enterprise 2.0 = Retention = SuccessSocial media in business. There's a lot of talk about that topic -- I've attended three conferences about it in the last week in Seattle alone. As I've listened in on the presentations and conversations I've heard people trading ideas for how to leverage Twitter to extend their brand, how to build facebook communities to engage with customers, how to establish blogs to demonstrate their thought leadership or to inform consumers about product developments and, then, how to tag those blog posts to garner the best search engine positioning to increase brand awareness.
Those are all valid uses of social media in business, but you'll notice they're all focused on projecting the business outward. Ideas like those above should be part of your social media strategy, but too often businesses make them the whole social media strategy. In doing so, they leave a big hole in the picture that social media can paint for a company. Namely, the role of social media inside the business to help the business gain competitive advantage in the knowledge economy. Now, when I talk about the knowledge economy, I'm using the definition presented here - an economy in which knowledge is a tool, where "expertise and know-how are as critical as other economic resources", where what your company knows and how efficiently you can access it to fuel innovation is your primary competitive advantage.
That's the economy we now find ourselves in. No longer an agrarian economy, no longer an industrial economy, no longer an information economy, now it's the knowledge economy. Now what you know and how quickly you can put it to use is the fundamental driver of your business success.
Within this new knowledge economy, Enterprise 2.0 (social media applied inside the business) is a critical contributor to business success. Enterprise 2.0 yields competitive advantage by breeding retention. Here's what I see:
There are two kinds of retention businesses should be focused on: of employees and of knowledge. Enterprise 2.0 addresses both.
Enterprise 2.0 and Employee Retention -- At last year's Enterprise 2.0 conference in Boston, Pete Fields of Wachovia outlined how adding wikis, blogs, IM, and social networking improved employees' engagement levels by providing them a means for input; something they craved and even expected. The result was improved retention levels, especially among younger workers, something that all businesses should take note of (Wachovia's subsequent fate notwithstanding). I was lucky enough to be there at last year's conference to see Pete's presentation; you can read an InformationWeek article about it here.
Enterprise 2.0 and Knowledge Retention -- Enterprise 2.0 also contributes to the retention within the organization of the knowledge that would otherwise walk out the door with retirees -- an issue of growing relevance to all companies now that the 80 million baby boom generation workers are reaching retirement age and an issue given even more acute importance by the economic collapse and the corresponding need to quickly reduce staff. Reducing staff without capturing what they know is like burning money. Enterprise 2.0 solutions like those mentioned already (wikis, blogs, etc) give employees places to record what they know before they go. Once the knowledge is out of their heads, it takes on new life as a durable, accessible resource to the company. And not a static resource either, a living resource. Because the knowledge resides in social media tools, users of that knowledge -- other current employees as well as future employees -- have the opportunity to add to the body of knowledge, to add their ideas, to highlight and promote the most useful knowledge and in so doing, to generate new and better knowledge unique to their organization.
I mentioned that Pete Fields spoke about young employees expecting to have social media applications available within the workplace on which to collaborate and offer their input. That's a point not to be overlooked as we move deeper into the knowledge economy. Employees use social media all the time in their personal lives outside of work, the youngest of them have grown up using social media all their lives -- it's not a hobby, it's a basic element of how they find one another, communicate with one another, think, research, and write. They do it socially and asymmetrically and it's articifial to expect them to leave that at the door when they enter the workplace. Since these social media practices are not hobbies but are central to how these younger workers operate, asking them to leave social media behind and work according to traditional models is akin to asking them to work in a language other than their native language. In addition to the retention benefit outlined above, then, incorporating social media practices inside the company helps companies access the full expertise of their next generation workforce and that translates into greater success in the new knowledge economy.
Finally, as some additional background, I came across this slide presentation by Oracle's Michael van Woudenberg. Of particular interest to me was this data about how businesses are using these social media practices internally today:
Managing knowledge -- 83%
Fostering Collaboration across company -- 78%
Enhancing Company Culture -- 74%
Training -- 71%
Developing Products or Services -- 67%
Internal recruiting -- 54%
Other internal -- 12%
Source: July 2008 McKinney Quarterly Survey on Web 2.0
Next Up: Organizational change through Enterprise 2.0 is incremental

4 comments:
<< Since these social media practices are not hobbies but are central to how these younger workers operate, asking them to leave social media behind and work according to traditional models is akin to asking them to work in a language other than their native language. >>
I'm not sure if this is your opinion specifically or if you're paraphrasing here what you heard Pete Fields say, but this is an interesting point and I'm wondering how accurate this is. Do we really think that asking a 22 year old fresh out of college to work in a traditional office without using social media is the same as asking them to work completely in Swahili? It's an interesting thought, I don't know enough people fresh out of school to know if this is true or not...? I would agree that they're much more comfortable using these tools than GenXers or Boomers would be, but that seems a bit extreme to me - maybe I'm wrong?
You're always ready for a good debate, I like that!
It is an interesting thought to consider such a difference in cognitive habits between one generation and another. One presentation at last year's conference explained that digital natives, the millennials, becuase they've grown up multi-tasking and thinking asymmetrically, finding and sharing with each other through a social networking model, they are in fact neurologically different than previous generations. That fact does have implications when you consider how to equip them to do their best work.
I don't mean to suggest, although I see how I give that impression, that these younger workers CAN'T adjust to the traditional models in workplace -- they can and I think they should be expected to learn the traditional models that are still relevant. What I'm suggesting is that they can be more effective if they are given tools that match the way they are accustomed to functioning. So it's not that they're coming into an environment and being asked to speak a non-native language that they know nothing about, it's more that while they can communicate in the non-native language, they're faster, more efficient, more effective and accurate if allowed to work in their native language.
Can the major-league right handed pitcher throw with his left hand? Yes, probably, with enough practice. But not a the same level he can when allowed to approach the task naturally.
Oooh - baseball metaphor!! You knew you'd have me with that! :-)
I do see your point - I guess (to continue the metaphor) that I see this next generation of office workers more like Carlos Beltran-type switch-hitters - he hits for power and average from both sides of the plate :-) And you're right, even the best switch-hitters tend to favor one side over the other; perhaps the question is how much of a limitation does NOT utilizing social media tools puts on this new generation of workers. Great opportunity for user testing, that's for sure! :-)
How much limitation does not utilizing social media tools put on the new generation of workers. Good question. I found this video of Pete Fields from Wachovia delivering a version of the presentation I saw in Boston (http://office20.com/docs/DOC-1130).
There's limitation on how they work when those tools aren't present, but Pete makes the point here that not using social media practices puts limits on the company success by putting limits on millennial workers in three areas -- "how satisfied are you with your level of input on decisions that effect your work", "I feel a strong connection with the company (which includes connection to peers through social network tools)", "I have opportunities for continuous learning (also enhanced through social networking tools since those help workers find mentor types)" -- How much limitation? Well, enough that before the addition of the social media tools engagement numbers among the youngest workers were dropping precipitously whereas after the addition of the tools, those engagement numbers are going up. Of course workers from other generations want to feel connected to the company, want opportunity to learn, want opportunities for input too. What's unique to the millennials is the degree to which the addition of social media tools effect their feelings in those three areas.
Post a Comment